-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.8k
[HiCache] Minor fix on file storage backend #9869
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @xiezhq-hermann, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request introduces a minor but significant fix to the HiCache file storage backend. The primary goal is to enhance the uniqueness and robustness of file keys by integrating the model's name into the key generation process. This ensures better data isolation and prevents potential collisions in the file system, leading to a more reliable caching mechanism.
Highlights
- Enhanced File Key Suffix Generation: The mechanism for generating unique suffixes for file storage keys has been updated to incorporate the model name, alongside the tensor parallel rank and size. This change ensures that cached files are more distinctly identified, preventing potential naming conflicts when different models utilize the same storage backend.
- Improved Configuration Suffix Naming: The variable
tp_suffix
has been renamed toconfig_suffix
to more accurately reflect its purpose, as it now includes comprehensive configuration details, including the model name.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command>
or @gemini-code-assist <command>
. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
Feature | Command | Description |
---|---|---|
Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/
folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request improves the HiCache file storage backend by incorporating the model name into the cache key suffix, which helps prevent cache collisions between different models. However, I've identified a critical issue where a None
value for model_name
would cause a server crash. I have provided a code suggestion to fix this.
Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Motivation
Modifications
Accuracy Tests
Benchmarking and Profiling
Checklist