-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 19
Support for reconcile confirmation against the in-memory canonical chain #174
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
Chengxuan
wants to merge
13
commits into
hyperledger:main
Choose a base branch
from
kaleido-io:reconcile-confirmation
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+1,897
−104
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
13 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
4e82ee6
adding function to calculate comfirmation map state
Chengxuan 2a64479
refactor confirmation map reconcile logic
Chengxuan 8651d54
fixign test and refactor
Chengxuan 4ccb06d
adding more tests and fixing bugs
Chengxuan ea0f58d
Apply suggestions from code review
Chengxuan 0a08612
fixing get_blockInfo not found logic.
Chengxuan 578db35
fixing formating
Chengxuan 5b9f1c8
don't treat brand new confirmation as a new fork
Chengxuan b16e6a8
fixing 0 confirmations behaviour
Chengxuan fe3e95e
Merge branch 'main' of github.com:hyperledger/firefly-evmconnect into…
Chengxuan c3c31f9
remove redundant check
Chengxuan 73498c9
Apply suggestions from code review
Chengxuan fe0fb66
rename variable
Chengxuan File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Are you going to do this figuring out as part of the PR? I did wonder why the TX hash -> block was not a thing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yes, would like to, waiting for @peterbroadhurst 's input