Skip to content

Conversation

claystation
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #3714

Copy link
Contributor

@gmlewis gmlewis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you, @claystation!
One minor tweak, please, otherwise LGTM.

Note that I still don't have write access to this repo, but figure I might as well attempt to catch up on my code reviews (which I usually allow the linter to process first... ah, well).

@@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ type BypassMode string
const (
BypassModeAlways BypassMode = "always"
BypassModePullRequest BypassMode = "pull_request"
BypassModeExempt BypassMode = "exempt"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Would you mind sorting these 4 lines please?
I'm not sure why they weren't originally sorted.
Thank you!

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey!
I pushed and update, let me know what you think!

@claystation
Copy link
Contributor Author

@gmlewis no rush. Hope you get access back soon enough!

@claystation claystation requested a review from gmlewis September 19, 2025 07:39
Copy link
Contributor

@gmlewis gmlewis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you, @claystation!
LGTM.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add support for ruleset exempt bypass
2 participants