Skip to content

Conversation

mergify[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@mergify mergify bot commented Sep 1, 2025

Why I'm doing:

Bucket shuffle/set operations may delete the exec group. This can cause the runtime filter to fail to locate the corresponding exec group during construction. In this PR, when the probe side cannot find the exec group, a dummy ID will be generated.

What I'm doing:

Fixes #issue

What type of PR is this:

  • BugFix
  • Feature
  • Enhancement
  • Refactor
  • UT
  • Doc
  • Tool

Does this PR entail a change in behavior?

  • Yes, this PR will result in a change in behavior.
  • No, this PR will not result in a change in behavior.

If yes, please specify the type of change:

  • Interface/UI changes: syntax, type conversion, expression evaluation, display information
  • Parameter changes: default values, similar parameters but with different default values
  • Policy changes: use new policy to replace old one, functionality automatically enabled
  • Feature removed
  • Miscellaneous: upgrade & downgrade compatibility, etc.

Checklist:

  • I have added test cases for my bug fix or my new feature
  • This pr needs user documentation (for new or modified features or behaviors)
    • I have added documentation for my new feature or new function
  • This is a backport pr

Bugfix cherry-pick branch check:

  • I have checked the version labels which the pr will be auto-backported to the target branch
    • 4.0
    • 3.5
    • 3.4
    • 3.3

This is an automatic backport of pull request #62465 done by [Mergify](https://mergify.com).

Copy link
Contributor Author

mergify bot commented Sep 1, 2025

🧪 CI Insights

Here's what we observed from your CI run for e240faa.

🟢 All jobs passed!

But CI Insights is watching 👀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant