Replies: 1 comment 2 replies
-
Hello, regarding the first issue you mentioned, we have already fixed it in this commit. As for the second issue, you can refer to our documentation: Customizing Environments Tutorial. If you encounter any problems while customizing the environment, feel free to start a discussion here. Thank you again for your attention and support! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
2 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hello,
1.
Could someone verify if entry_type == "train_muzero_with_gym_env" (setting at the end of the script) is working?
I tried it with:
python3 -u zoo/classic_control/cartpole/config/cartpole_efficientzero_config.py
Error:
/content/LightZero/lzero/worker/muzero_collector.py in collect(self, n_episode, train_iter, policy_kwargs, collect_with_pure_policy)
329 policy_kwargs = {}
330 temperature = policy_kwargs['temperature']
--> 331 epsilon = policy_kwargs['epsilon']
332
333 collected_episode = 0
KeyError: 'epsilon'
entry_type == "train_muzero" seems to be working fine.
I'm more of an "enthusiast" than a professional, so I would prefer to continue with a working example.
Is it beneficial to build a custom environment from scratch according to the LiteZero schema compared to using a Gym/Gymnasium environment and a wrapper? I can't find any configuration example for any train_xxxx_with_gym_env in the zoo.
Thank you!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions