Skip to content

storage type should be more specific #10

@agilgur5

Description

@agilgur5

The only reason it isn't is because there's a decent bit of work and decisions to ensure it conforms with localStorage and localForage (and similar type interfaces). See discussion in #8 (comment)

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    scope: typesRelated to type definitions

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions